![]() (I believe one of the reasons I was targeted was because of my then friendship with Boris Johnson, with whom I worked on The Spectator, but most of my voice messages must have made dull listening. I replied I would feel more traumatised if my phone hadn’t been thought worth hacking. ![]() They told me how traumatised and shocked I must feel. I found this out from Scotland Yard, who sent detectives round to my house. My phone was hacked by the tabloids in the early 2000s. His constant cri de coeur is that no one comprehends how he feels. Once again, his willingness to share details about personal relationships with women makes him less Lochinvar than louche. Did it not occur to Harry, who feels every prick of life like a dagger, that revisiting the flora of their affair might distress this blameless person who, unlike Meghan, backed out of the strobe lights? Did he even bother to consult her before he sued?Īccording to a Davy family friend, he did not. Was it right to drag her name into court?ĭavy is married, and has a young child. How does he square his gallant protection of one woman with his willingness to throw another to the wolves, and indeed to the tabloids? Pity Chelsy Davy, the Chandleresque blonde whose youthful dalliance with Harry is now known to people who weren’t even born when it happened. ![]() Never mind that “abuse” is not predicated on hacking, and that the alleged hacking took place between 19, years before he met the Duchess ![]() There are thumping paradoxes in his argument. Just when I thought Harry had brought his hacking case because the tabloids used to call him a thicko, he popped up all chevalier-like to say it was about “stopping the abuse” of Meghan. I can’t keep up with Prince Lochinvar, I really can’t. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |